"Labyrinth: The War on Terror, 2001 – ?" board game box with an image of a soldier walking and the game designed by Volko Ruhnke, published by GMT Games LLC ©2010.
| | | | | | | | |

Labyrinth: The War on Terror, 2001 – ? (2010)

Labyrinth: The War on Terror, 2001 – ?

“Labyrinth: The War on Terror, 2001–?” is a board game published by GMT Games in 2010, designed to depict the post-2001 struggle between the United States and various radical Islamist jihadist groups. The game is set in the real-world context of the War on Terror and aims to provide a multifaceted simulation spanning recent history.

Why is Labyrinth: The War on Terror, 2001 – ? Popular?

The game is popular and significant because it:
– Offers a unique and immersive experience in the world of wargaming, with a focus on recent history and geopolitical events.
– Provides a complex and challenging simulation of the War on Terror, allowing players to explore the intricacies of global politics and military strategy.
– Features a card-driven gameplay mechanism, which adds depth and replayability to the game.

Game Components of Labyrinth: The War on Terror, 2001 – ?

  • Game Board: Represents a map covering Europe, Africa, and Asia, focusing on countries with significant Muslim populations.
  • Cards: A deck of cards that represent historical events, which can be played for their event effects or resource value.
  • Counters: Track US troop deployments, Jihadist cells, resources, and sentiment.
  • Dice: Used to determine the success of various actions, including moving cells and improving governance.

    How To Setup Labyrinth: The War on Terror, 2001 – ?

    Setup involves placing the game board, shuffling and dealing the card deck, and positioning the counters according to the initial game state. The process typically takes 5-15 minutes. The game includes detailed rules and a playbook to guide the setup and initial play.

    Gameplay Mechanics and Game Objective

  • Asymmetric Gameplay: Players take on the roles of either the United States or the Jihadists, each with distinct objectives and mechanics.
  • US Objective: Neutralize terrorist cells and encourage Muslim democratic reform to cut off extremism. Win by bringing enough Muslim countries to a high level of governance or eliminating all terror cells.
  • Jihadist Objective: Spread Islamist rule over Muslim countries and potentially execute a major terror attack on US soil.
  • Card-Driven Mechanics: Cards can be played for their event effects or resource value. Playing an opponent’s card for resource value triggers the event, adding a strategic layer.
  • Dice Rolls: Determine the success of actions such as moving cells, fomenting plots, and improving governance.

    Player Experience

    Playing **Labyrinth** feels like navigating a complex web of political, military, and ideological conflicts. The US player must balance military force with diplomatic efforts, while the Jihadist player must remain elusive and exploit opportunities for terrorist actions. The game rewards strategic thinking and adaptability, as the card deck and dice rolls introduce a significant amount of randomness and unpredictability. The solo mode allows a single player to take on the ascending challenges of the game, but the multiplayer experience is where the game truly shines, capturing the asymmetrical nature of the conflict.

    Pros

  • Historical Realism: The game is praised for its attempt to simulate the real-world complexities of the War on Terror.
  • Deep Strategy: Offers a rich and challenging gameplay experience with a high replay value.
  • Asymmetric Mechanics: Each side has unique strategies and challenges, enhancing the game’s realism and replayability.
  • Awards and Recognition: Won several awards, including the 2010 James F. Dunnigan Design Elegance Award and the 2010 Charles S. Roberts Best Post-WW2 Era Board Wargame.

    Cons

  • Complexity: The game is considered more complex and less intuitive than similar games like *Twilight Struggle*, which can make it difficult to learn and master.
  • Randomness: The significant use of dice rolls and card combinations can lead to sudden and dramatic changes in the game state, which some players may find frustrating.
  • Mixed Reviews: Some reviewers found the game’s portrayal of the War on Terror to be overly simplistic or flawed, and the expansions received underwhelming reviews.

    Personal Thoughts on Labyrinth: The War on Terror, 2001 – ?

    This game is ideal for players who enjoy deep, strategic gameplay and are interested in historical and geopolitical themes. It is particularly suited for those who appreciate asymmetric gameplay and are willing to invest time in learning the complex mechanics. However, it may not be the best fit for casual players or those seeking a quick, simple gaming experience. The game’s ability to simulate the intricate dynamics of the War on Terror makes it a compelling choice for enthusiasts of wargames and historical simulations.

    We are supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, at no extra cost for you. Learn more