Article 27: The UN Security Council Game (2012) Board Game

Article 27: The UN Security Council Game was released in 2012 and designed by Michael Christopher. It is a game that simulates the dynamics of the United Nations Security Council, where players take on the roles of different countries and negotiate, trade, and vote to achieve their strategic objectives.

Game Components of Article 27: The UN Security Council Game

Proposal cards: Each player presents a proposal to the Council, which can affect the player themselves.

Bribe money: Used in negotiations to sway votes.

Secret agenda cards: Players receive these at the beginning, influencing their objectives.

Vote tokens: Players use these to cast their votes.

Wooden gavel: Symbolic tool used by the Secretary General to initiate and conclude voting rounds.

How To Setup Article 27: The UN Security Council Game

To set up the game, each player receives a secret agenda card and a starting amount of bribe money. The role of the UN Secretary General is passed to each player in turn. The game begins with the first player presenting a proposal, marking the start of the negotiations phase.

Gameplay Mechanics and Game Objective

Negotiations: Players openly negotiate what points and bribes they need to vote for a proposal.

Voting: After negotiations, players vote “yes” or “no” on the proposal. A single “no” vote can dismiss the proposal.

Role of Secretary General: Rotates among players, each taking turns presenting proposals and managing the voting process.

Objective: Players aim to maximize their score based on bribe money, points from proposal cards, and fulfilling their secret agenda.

Player Experience

Playing **Article 27: The UN Security Council Game** immerses players in the art of negotiation and bargaining, mirroring real-world diplomatic scenarios. It teaches the importance of consensus in policy-making and introduces players to the shadow dynamics of international politics. The game enhances decision-making skills and provides a fun, interactive way to understand the complexities of the UN Security Council.

Pros

Educational value: Players gain insights into international diplomacy and negotiation tactics.

Interactive gameplay: Encourages active participation and strategic thinking.

Social engagement: Fosters negotiation and bargaining among players.

Variable gameplay: Secret agendas and rotating roles ensure each game is unique.

Cons

Complexity: May be overwhelming for new players due to the negotiation and voting mechanics.

Time-consuming: Games can extend in length depending on the number of players and their negotiation styles.

Limited clarity on rules: Some players might find the rules and setup slightly confusing without a detailed guide.

Personal Thoughts on Article 27: The UN Security Council Game

This game is ideal for those interested in politics, international relations, and strategic negotiation. It is a great tool for family game nights or educational settings, as it combines fun with learning. However, it may not be the best fit for casual gamers seeking a light, quick game experience. Instead

We are supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, at no extra cost for you. Learn more.